1332d166-4c65-481b-adde-aac0bdc475a3 Output Quality Levels If a quality level has been assigned to an output, then this is the assessment of the level of quality on the REF scale (http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/) 19258084-7068-4be1-8cfd-171952060f0c Pending Grading RMAS project An assessment has yet to be made of the quality level of the output. http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/ f9237eb5-a5c9-433f-887d-e2eac703bc18 4-Star REF 2014; RMAS project Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour. http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/ 9e93db57-3349-4bb9-bfba-9481302b4784 3-Star REF 2014; RMAS project Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which falls short of the highest standards of excellence. http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/ 7f1998ce-ddfa-4ece-af02-2eed9a48c8d2 2-Star REF 2014; RMAS project Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour. http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/ 89644214-e41f-4c30-befb-ab5d9443c08b 1-Star REF 2014; RMAS project Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour. http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/ 7ea05f8e-bd27-4f33-bfa4-54dfb3e6f905 Unclassified REF 2014; RMAS project Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of this assessment. http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/